Sheet 3: 4 control points were used to register (georeference) the East half of the scanned image. The resulting RMS error was 25 m on the ground(standard deviation =2.7). Examination of the registered image against the provincial 1:250,000-scale hydrography data indicates the positional accuracy is better than +/- 100 m. 5 control points were used to register (georeference) the West half of the scanned image. The resulting RMS error was 19 m on the ground(standard deviation = 14.5). Examination of the registered image against the provincial 1:250,000-scale hydrography data indicates the relative positional accuracy is better than +/- 100 m.
Sheet 4: 7 control points were used to register (georeference) the scanned map image. The resulting RMS error was 42.5 m on the ground(standard deviation = 14.2). Examination of the registered image against the provincial 1:250,000-scale hydrography data indicates the relative positional accuracy is better than +/- 100 m.
Sheet 2: 5 control points were used to register (georeference) the scanned map image. The resulting RMS error was 13.3 m on the ground(standard deviation = 5.5). Examination of the registered image against the provincial 1:250,000-scale hydrography data indicates the relative positional accuracy is better than +/- 100 m.
Sheet 5: 7 control points were used to register (georeference) the scanned map image. The resulting RMS error was 39 m on the ground(standard deviation = 20.8). Examination of the registered image against the provincial 1:250,000-scale hydrography data indicates the relative positional accuracy is better than +/- 100 m.
Sheet 6: Registration details were not recorded. Examination of the registered image against the provincial 1:250,000-scale hydrography data indicates the relative positional accuracy is better than +/- 100 m, west of the -114 degree meridian, and +/- 200 m on the East of it.
Sheet 1: 11 control points were used to register (georeference) the scanned map image. The resulting RMS error was 63 m on the ground(standard deviation = 27.2). Examination of the registered image against the provincial 1:250,000-scale hydrography data indicates the relative positional accuracy is better than +/- 150 m.